Pennsylvania Supreme Court Again Blocks Counting Undated Absentee Ballots
Key Points
*- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court blocked the counting of undated absentee ballots, a move that could affect the results of the closely contested U.S. Senate race.
- The court ruled that state law requires all absentee ballots to be dated in order to be counted.
- Democrats and Republicans have been arguing over the issue for weeks, with Democrats supporting the counting of undated ballots and Republicans opposing it.
Background
The issue of undated absentee ballots in Pennsylvania has been a source of controversy for weeks. Democrats have argued that these ballots should be counted, while Republicans have argued that they should not. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled on the issue on Friday, blocking the counting of undated absentee ballots.
The Court's Decision
The court's decision was based on the Pennsylvania Election Code, which states that all absentee ballots must be dated by the voter. The court ruled that this requirement is clear and unambiguous, and that it must be enforced. The court also rejected the argument that the requirement is unconstitutional.
The Impact of the Decision
The court's decision could have a significant impact on the results of the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania. The race is currently very close, and the counting of undated absentee ballots could have tipped the scales in either direction. The decision could also have implications for other elections in Pennsylvania in the future.
The Reaction to the Decision
The reaction to the court's decision has been mixed. Democrats have expressed disappointment, while Republicans have expressed satisfaction. The decision is likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and it is unclear how the court will rule.
Conclusion
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision to block the counting of undated absentee ballots is a significant development in the state's U.S. Senate race. The decision could have a major impact on the outcome of the race, and it is likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
